Magnepan Vs Martin Logan

Magnepan Vs Martin Logan – Both of these speakers are. The main difference between martin logan and magnepan sound is that martin logan is electrostatic while magnepan sound is planar. I'll assume we're talking about hybrid martin logans, and leaving out the sadly discontinued cls. Martin logan and magnepan sound differ primarily in that martin logan is electrostatic, and magnepan sound is planar.

I have heard martin logans extensively. So i liked both a lot, but could someone. Magnepans and martin logans (any electrostat) sound fundamentally different. In the lower midrange to upper bass, magnepan tends to.

The electrostatic martin logan ethos and the quasi ribbon magnepan 1.7s. This means magnepan sound offers excellent highs and mids,. In the midrange, esls rule, at least in my book, but again not by a wide margin.

The quads are a little more demanding on the amp as they have a very low impedance at high frequencys, where as the magnepan speakers are a constant. I am joining this forum after auditioning a pair of martin logan ethos and the magnepan 1.7 speakers this past week. Maggies have more high end than electrostats, probably due to the tweeter.

It means magnepan sound has great highs and mids, but not so great lows. In general i’m an esl fan, have been since the seventies with quad (57s) & janszen/ar systems, eighties with quad (63s), soundlab, acoustat, several others too. *use headphones for a better experience* sound test:

Magnepan sound speakers are inexpensive, but they take some time to tweak and set up properly. #1 i am trying to decide between magnepan 1.7i (hybrid planar) and martin logan esl (hybrid electrostat). The martin logan electrostatic speakers use a dynamic subwoofer in addition to the electrostatic tweeter, so i was wondering how the full frequency spectrum of a.

首听Magnepan 3.7i扬声器绝对的声音 2022世界杯半决赛